Categories
Crops & Gardening

Extra Garden Time

I never thought I’d be more disappointed when my computer died than when a plant died, but it has happened. 

My 7-year-old IBM has officially bit the dust.  It has been very good to me over the years; drafting three book manuscripts, hundreds of newspaper and magazine articles, and holding what seems like a million digital images of my garden. 

 How sad to see that dreaded ‘blue screen of death’ pop up repeatedly—I feel like an old friend has left me. 

The good news, of course, is that I’m getting a new one—and a Mac to boot.  Not sure how that transition will go (I’m writing this post on my husband’s Mac as practice!).  Learning curves get steeper with age, don’t you think?

So the ‘death’ of my computer has actually made for a surprisingly pleasant few days.  Without Facebook, the internet, email or access to my work files for the hours while my husband is working on his computer, I have had a bit of extra time in the garden.  No excuse for not weeding when work can’t call me away. 

So, I spent a few hours yesterday in the garden planting some perennial divisions that I nabbed from my mother’s garden on a visit there last week and moving some stuff around. 

These are chores I usually save for autumn or early spring, but when you have the time, there’s no time as good as right now.  I also deadheaded nearly everything and have finally removed the fortress fencing from around the strawberries and blueberries.  Still so much to do, but it felt good. 

And so, I am left with a few more days of computerless-ness.  I’ll be in the garden pulling out the peas, weeding and harvesting. See ya.   

« More Dirt on Gardening »

Categories
News

A Farmer’s Carbon Market

Farmland and forest
Courtesy Stock.XCHNG
No-till farmers and landowners with trees can take advantage of carbon-offset credits.

As the United States puts more of its energy into green practices, trading carbon credits from farmland may play a particularly important role in the lives of farmers.

When carbon is emitted into the atmosphere by vehicles or other means, it can be absorbed and stored by trees and other plants and might eventually wind up in the soil as organic matter. No-till fields store carbon in the soil in the form of organic matter, which can be sold by farmers, providing them with an additional source of income.

“Carbon credits are currently a voluntarily method used by organizations that want to offset their carbon emissions,” says Lenny Farlee, a forestry specialist at the Purdue Extension. “But it also creates an opportunity for farmers that may have no-till fields or landowners who replant forest trees.”

Carbon-offset credits are sold through the Chicago Climate Exchange, which operates like a stock exchange. Carbon is typically offset by agriculture methane capture, no-till farming, grasslands and planting trees.

The CCX will accept a minimum of 100 tons of carbon at a time. Most farmers or landowners sell credits through an aggregator, comparable to a stock broker, who will combine multiple landowners’ credits together.

“An aggregator will lump several accounts together until it reaches 100 tons or more and sell the carbon to the CCX,” Farlee says. “This is really the easiest solution for farmers and landowners because some people do not own enough land to sell 100 tons of carbon, and the aggregator can handle most of the administrative work associated with selling the credits.”

Carbon from grasslands and no-till farming is sold to the CCX at a fixed rate per acre. Carbon from trees is sold at a fixed rate based on tree species, age of the plant and the region where it’s located.

“Two years ago, the market for carbon offsets was [as high as] $7.50 a ton, but because of the economy and uncertainty about the future structure of carbon markets, it is 10 cents a ton today,” Farlee says.

As the voluntary program becomes more popular, the federal government is debating whether to make reduction of carbon emissions a mandatory system. 

“There have been legislative proposals in place for about a year,” Farlee says. “Part of the debate is over making the carbon emissions reduction system a carbon tax or a market-based offset and reduction system or whether to have a mandatory reduction system at all.”

Under a carbon tax, emitters might be charged based on carbon emission rates above an established threshold. If an offset market system is used, the entities emitting carbon could be allowed to buy and sell carbon offset credits based on their carbon emission reductions and offset credits to meet a required total emissions target.

“Europe has installed a mandatory carbon reduction and offset system, and the price per ton of carbon offset credits has been between $20 and $35 a ton,” Farlee says. “It is hard to predict what the future will bring here in the United States in terms of legislation related to reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.”

Farlee advises farmers and landowners to wait until the proposal is finalized before they sell their carbon because the market is depressed at this time.

Categories
Urban Farming

Eco-Innovators Brainstorm Clean Energy

Solar Roadways project

Courtesy Dan Walden

This illustration shows a road if Scott Brusaw’s clean-energy project, Solar Roadways, comes to fruition. Brusaw entered the project in the GE Ecomagination Challenge.

About seven months ago, University of Wisconsin graduate students Steve Faulkner and Michael Major started GeoHuddle, a company that develops ground-source heat pumps, as part of a clean-technology competition.

“We felt that ground-source heat pumps stood out as a great technology that was proven, easy to implement and scalable,” says Faulkner, noting that their system targets new residential subdivisions in order to reduce household energy use by 60 to 70 percent and household carbon-dioxide emissions by 15 percent.

As part of the GeoHuddle mission, they want to overcome what they believe is the largest barrier keeping this sort of technology from the average suburban household—cost.

Now, thanks to the positive feedback they received on their project, the duo is vying against other clean-technology champions as part of GE’s Ecomagination Challenge—and so far, they aren’t doing too shabbily. (As of posting article, the GeoHuddle team stood in fourth place out of 786 ideas in Ecomagination’s public vote.)

In the fifth year of the Ecomagination Challenge, GE is collaborating with venture capital firms to invite clean-technology innovators, entrepreneurs and students to submit project proposals focused on creating an electric grid. From July 13, 2010, to Sept. 30, 2010, participants competing in the categories of Renewables, Grid and Eco Homes/Eco Buildings will have the chance to win $100,000 to put toward their clean-energy project or a commercial relationship with GE to see their project to fruition.

“GeoHuddle is a perfect fit for the challenge, because we have a proven scalable technology and all we need is investment to start building,” Faulkner says. “We even have developers interested in installing our system.”

However, with nearly two months remaining in the Ecomagination Challenge, GeoHuddle has some stiff competition. Taking first place in the public vote (as of Aug. 3, 2010) is Solar Roadways, brain child of Scott and Julie Brusaw.

As a kid, Scott Brusaw dreamed of electric roads and his favorite toy was his electric slot car track. Now, as an electrical engineer (and certified-grown-up), he’s making his childhood dream a reality.

Brusaw says his solar road panel addresses all three of the Ecomagination’s categories by providing an intelligent road system that doubles as a decentralized, secure, self-healing Smart Grid.

“We’ve seen no idea offered yet that can solve so many of our problems: infrastructure (road and power grid), climate change, water pollution, safety, national security … the list goes on and on,” Brusaw says.

Features of the Solar Roadways project include an electric road where electric vehicles can charge anywhere; electric vehicles that have the same range as their gas-guzzling counterparts; LED-lit roads; heated road surfaces; and the ability to capture, clean and store storm water until it can be reused. 

“We believe that we have the most innovative idea in the contest to date,” says Brusaw, though that decision is still left up to GE.

All Ecomagination Challenge entries will be evaluated by a committee of representatives from GE businesses and the partner firms. Partner firms include Emerald Technology Ventures, Foundation Capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, and RockPort Capital. Winners of the competition will be announced in October 2010.

While both participating teams say they hope to further their clean-energy project by winning the competition, they will continue their developments no matter the outcome.

Click here for more information on how to enter your clean-energy idea in the GE Ecomagination Challenge or to vote on your favorite entry.

Categories
Animals

Screaming Katydids

katydid
Photo by Sue Weaver

Uzzi and Tank and I can’t sleep because the screaming katydids are keeping us awake. There are thousands on our farm. It sounds like a jungle at night!

Wikipedia says there are 6,400 species of katydids in the world and 255 in North America.

Ours are called True Katydids. They’re 2 inches long and bright leaf green, with two sets of wings, and long, long antennae up front.

Both sexes “sing” in the summer but the males scream all night (they do it to attract mates, by rubbing their forewings together).

Females respond with a call that sounds like “Katy did, Katy didn’t”; that’s how these bugs got their name.

Katydids eat leaves and their favorite is oak, so they live in the oaks on our ridge.

Males and females look alike except females have a hook-shaped structure called an ovipositor on their abdomens. They use it to glue eggs to the underside of leaves. Eggs hatch in 2 or 3 months. New baby katydids (called nymphs) look like big katydids but smaller, and they have no wings.

County folk say katydids foretell the first frost of autumn, that frost comes 3 months after katydids start singing at night.

If just one katydid is calling (fat chance that happening here!), you can tell the temperature by counting his calls per minute, adding 161 and dividing that total by 3.

Another thing to know about katydids: if you handle them roughly—they bite!

« More Mondays with Martok »

Categories
Urban Farming

The Lemonade Stand

Audrey Pavia and Spanish Mustang

Courtesy Audrey Pavia

Milagro, my Spanish Mustang, was a real comedian during the Trail Trials.

Horses that live in urban environments have a very different lifestyle from those in rural areas. Urban equines have to deal with all kinds of crazy stuff that country horses will never see.

I’m guessing this is the reasoning behind some of the obstacles that appear in California State Horsemen’s Association Trail Trials. These three-hour competitive trail rides require horses to negotiate a number of obstacles that they might only see when being ridden on city trails.

I love to compete with my Spanish Mustang, Milagro, in Trail Trials. It’s a fun way to spend a day out on the trail with a buddy. Most of the time, my trail buddy is Kathy T., who rides a giant Belgian gelding named Bob.

During a recent Trail Trial, we came face-to-face with an obstacle only an urban trail rider could truly appreciate: a lemonade stand. Our task as riders was to approach the lemonade stand one at a time, stop, receive a cup of lemonade from the judge, drop a penny into a Tupperware container on a table and deposit the empty cup in a nearby trashcan. No sweat, I thought. Milagro is good about approaching things like tables, and will stop and stand politely until I ask him to move forward.

Kathy and I decided Milagro would go first on this obstacle. As she and Bob waited nearby, my horse and I approached the lemonade stand.

Milagro stopped obediently when we came up next to the table. The judge greeted me and handed me a cup. Just as I raised it to my lips to drink, Milagro spied the Tupperware container, which was half-full with pennies. Before I could do anything to stop him, he grabbed the edge of the container in his mouth and started tossing his head. Pennies were flying everywhere, landing on me, on the horse and in the dirt.

The judge reached for the container and tried to take it from Milagro’s mouth, but my horse would have none of it. As the judge struggled to get the container away from him, Milagro continued to toss the container until all the pennies were on the ground.

As I sat there in helpless horror, I heard Kathy laughing hysterically behind me. The Trail Trial volunteers who stood nearby were giggling until the judge managed to wrestle the empty container out of Milagro’s mouth.

After everyone had regained their composure, I offered to get off and pick up the pennies, but the judge told me not to worry about it. I then proceeded to the empty Tupperware container, dropped in my penny, rode to the trash can and deposited my empty cup.

Milagro and I waited nearby for Kathy and Bob to complete the obstacle. Kathy was stifling her giggles as she effortlessly performed the necessary steps, and then lost it once again after the judged thanked her and told her she could move on.

Later that day when I looked at my scores, I expected to see pretty low marks for “lack of horse control.” Surprisingly, the judge gave me a good score and we managed to pull a fifth place in our division out of quite a few competitors. I suspect Milagro secretly got an extra point or two for providing comedic relief.

Read more of City Stock »

Categories
Equipment

Dennis the Carpenter

table saw
Photo by Jim Ruen

On a recent vacation, my family and I stopped to visit my cousin Dennis Hagen and his family.

Dennis’ mother and father homesteaded in central Canada early in the 20th century. They lived most of their lives in a true log cabin, not a log home that came in a kit.

They struggled to build a good life for themselves and their children, a struggle that continued on to the next generation as a large and prosperous farm was created, literally out of blood, sweat and tears.

Dennis is one of my heroes. A tall, spare man, he has battled Parkinson’s disease for more than 10 years. While it is beating down his body, his wit and humor continue as strong as ever.

The way he refuses to give up or even complain about his condition is reason enough for hero status, but that is not all that makes him stand out.

When his father needed a barn built, a carpenter was hired, and Dennis was assigned to be his helper. By the time the two had finished, Dennis was on his way to being a craftsman.

Of course, a craftsman needs tools, and a good table saw with its ability to raise, lower and tilt the blade for beveled cuts can’t be beat.

However, Dennis didn’t have the money to buy one, so Dennis built it. The saw sits in his workshop today, and a fine example of craftsmanship it is, having served Dennis well for the past half century. Unlike commercially crafted saws, the blade doesn’t tilt, raise or lower. The table, fabricated from the top of a wooden desk, moves.

Next week I’ll explain how he built it with simple carpentry tools, off the shelf hardware and a little help from a friend.

<< More Shop Talk >>

Categories
Equipment

Dennis’ Table Saw

The beauty of a table saw is the way the blade can be adjusted for depth and angle cuts. When my cousin Dennis Hagen built his own, he didn’t have the metal tooling needed to adjust the blade, so he fashioned an adjustable worktable.

A farmer that he was doing carpentry work for helped him with the limited amount of metal work needed, while his banker donated a heavy wooden desk he was replacing at the time. The table, legs, frame and various other pieces were recycled from the desk.

The saw has six legs. Two sets of uprights are for horizontal sawing, and a third set is fixed at a 45 degree angle for added support when the tabletop tilts to that angle. Curved arms hold the tabletop in the desired position with notches for quickly setting the top at 30 degree and 45 degree cutting angles.

To raise and lower the saw, as well as to draw the blade into the wood as one does with a radial arm saw, Dennis devised a special blade carriage that rides on an inner frame. A hand lever moves the carriage up and down, and a foot pedal draws the blade forward into the wood being cut and back out.

When he was finished, Dennis made sets of shelves for both the farmer and the banker in appreciation for their help. As he once told me, “The saw worked fine for the shelves and for many jobs since.”

There was a time when an apprentice made the tools of his trade as he learned it. When he had learned all that his master could teach him, he was a craftsman. One could tell the quality of the craftsman by the quality of his tools.

Looking at Dennis’ hand crafted table saw, the quality of his craft is evident.

<< More Shop Talk >>

Categories
News

Tomato Grafting Opens Possibilities

Tomato grafting
Courtesy Ohio State University Extension
Researchers successfully grafted prolific tomato varieties with disease-resistant tomato varieties for a high-production tomato plant.

Open-field and high-tunnel tomato producers yearning for high-quality crop performance with marketable fruit neatly wrapped in one plant may find what they are looking for through grafting.

Ohio State University researchers with the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center have found success using grafting to improve tomato production. Grafting is a technique whereby the foliage of one plant (scion) is fused onto the root system of another plant (rootstock).

“We chose tomato because it is susceptible to a number of field stresses, very important economically and responds to grafting,” says Matt Kleinhenz, a vegetable crops specialist at the Ohio State University Extension. “Still, other crops such as cantaloupe, watermelon and cucumber can also be grafted. So, what is learned with tomato grafting may also apply to these crops.”

Until now, grafting has been reserved for the green industry and hydroponic-vegetable production, but Kleinhenz thinks that open-field and high-tunnel tomato producers could also employ the technique. Grafting in high tunnels may be particularly popular, because of the scale and economics of high-tunnel tomato production.

Typically, the rootstock varieties resist soil-borne diseases more effectively than the natural roots of the scion, and may also be more vigorous or scavenge nutrients and water more effectively. However, the rootstock tomato varieties usually don’t produce marketable fruit—so that responsibility lies in the scion tomato variety.  The combination of the two tomato varieties may work to the grower’s benefit.

To put it in simpler terms, let’s say a tomato producer has one tomato variety (Variety A) that has a delicious fruit, but poor disease resistance or high water or nutrient needs. The producer also has a second tomato variety (Variety B) with an undesirable fruit, but it’s extremely hardy. By grafting the two varieties, he may end up with a tomato plant that has the desirable fruit of Variety A tomato and the hardiness of Variety B tomato.

“Growers and consumers aim for crops to be produced as responsibly as possible, so combining Varieties A and B may be an effective and responsible choice,” Kleinhenz says. “Grafted plants may require less pesticide, fertilizer and water to remain healthy and productive.”

Researchers are finding that grafting may improve tomato varieties more quickly and efficiently compared to traditional genetic breeding. While this may be a better approach, it may require extra time, specialized skills and other resources.

“Ironically, when grafting succeeds, it opens the door for more breeding because of the need for more commercial rootstocks and scions. Grafting also opens the door to using varieties previously thought to have little value given their weaknesses,” Kleinhenz says.

Kleinhenz and his colleagues are now entering their final year of the three-year project, funded by OARDC SEEDS, the USDA’s Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative, and the Ohio Produce and Marketers Association’s Ohio Vegetable and Small Fruit Research and Development Program.

OARDC researchers are collaborating with researchers from the University of Minnesota, West Virginia State University, North Carolina State University and Penn State University. Farmers have also contributed significantly to the project from the beginning and continue to test the performance of grafted plants on their farms.

“Overall, we have shown that grafted tomato plants can outperform ungrafted ones (especially when soil-borne disease and low soil moisture are present), identified strategies for overcoming obstacles to the use of grafted plants, and helped educate people to prepare grafted plants for themselves or others,” Kleinhenz says.

According to Kleinhenz, while tomatoes are an important crop to many farmers, most rely heavily on a few varieties that meet certain characteristics in weight, size, color, taste and storage time.

“Grafting means a greater ability for farmers to provide these qualities under challenging field conditions, while maintaining ties to sustainability for consumers,” he says.

For the project, researchers genetically bred 46 rootstocks and grafted them to two popular tomato cultivars: Cherokee Purple and Celebrity. They then compared field and high-tunnel grafted tomatoes to nongrafted tomatoes and found that in both production systems, grafted tomatoes out-yielded nongrafted tomatoes anywhere from 5 to 30 percent. The tomato yield increases were greatest in the presence of soil-borne diseases and in drought conditions.

In addition, researchers found that the chemical makeup of grafted fruit was indistinguishable to nongrafted fruit, meaning that the characteristics consumers use to measure a good fruit remained unchanged.

Finally, researchers found that grafted tomatoes had a higher productivity during the course of the season. The plants were large and healthy despite, in some cases, having not been fertilized, which is especially good news for organic producers, Kleihenz says.

Categories
Urban Farming

Aerial Pumpkins and Wrinkled Tomatoes

Pumpkin stand on trellis

Photo by Rick Gush

My pumkins, which are planted on a trellis, need extra support as they grow, so I built this pumpkin support system.

Gardening on a cliff presents some amusing problems.

I really like growing squash vines, but there’s no way I have enough horizontal space for these sprawlers. So what I do usually is grow the vines on the edge of a terrace and let them spill down across the terraces below. I have four winter squash vines that have grown down the 20-foot face where I have some wild asparagus plants and a half dozen other squash vines that are starting to crawl across the lemon tree on the terrace below where they are planted. My trombetti squash are already about 16 feet long, and a few of the vines look like they might be able to make it another 20 feet down toward the street level. All the big green squash leaves look very attractive with the bright yellow flowers on the vines. 

For my pumpkins this year, I dug some big pits at the back of one bed and filled them with the compost from my organic refuse collector. I planted the pumpkin seeds in water wells at the back of the bed in such a way that the plants would have almost 10 feet of open dirt before they reached the edge of the terrace. With pumpkins, I like to bury the first five or six nodes of the vines in order that each node can develop its own set of roots. This multi-rooting system seems best for supporting the huge growth spurts that big pumpkins go through when they are growing the pumpkin fruits. Once a pumpkin fruit sets, I can see it get bigger every day for about a month before the enlargement slows or stops.

This is all fine, except the pumpkins are now covering an overhead trellis on the terrace below where they’re planted. It was pretty clear that while the trellis could support the vines and leaves, big heavy pumpkins hanging in mid air at the top of a 70-foot-tall cliff above our parking lot was a recipe for messy disaster.

So now I’ve built some tall cane supports that have sturdy baskets about 7 feet above ground level.  The baskets should be able to support the weight of a big, mature pumpkin, but if the fruits keep getting bigger, I may have to think about adding reinforcements.

INSERT ALT TEXT

Photo by Rick Gush

i grow Costoluta tomatoes in my garden.

Today’s second photo is of some of our Costoluta tomatoes that are fruiting like crazy these days. Costoluta tomatoes are pretty common here, and each region seems to have their own varieties that the locals grow. Here in Liguria, a lot of gardeners grow Cuore di Bue, which means “Ox Heart.” We’re growing Cuore di Bue ourselves. My wife isn’t nuts about them, but I like them sliced in balsamic vinegar and my sister and mother in law take everything we send them.

These monsters develop in clusters of six or seven fruit, and the weight of all that fruit means that these plants also need extra support from canes, even though the sturdy trunks of these tomatoes are an inch and a half thick. With all the plants needing support, I calculate I’m using about a hundred Arundo canes, and there a few areas where I should have used more. Obviously, cutting a bunch of new canes will be one of this winter’s projects.

Read more of Digging Italy »